...to what the future looked like in 1969:
Bruce P. Mehlman
The Internet Innovation Alliance is a broad-based coalition of business and non-profit organizations that aim to ensure every American, regardless of race, income or geography, has access to the critical tool that is broadband Internet. The IIA seeks to promote public policies that support equal opportunity for universal broadband availability and adoption so that everyone, everywhere can seize the benefits of the Internet - from education to health care, employment to community building, civic engagement and beyond.
Friday, April 02
...to what the future looked like in 1969:
Thursday, April 01
Last week, former FCC commissioner Deborah Taylor Tate penned a guest editorial for The Tennessean on the role of private investment to make the National Broadband Plan become a reality:
I heartily agree with FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski’s remarks that “government has a crucial, but restrained, role” and that private investment and competition “play a vital role” in broadband expansion. Government could never have envisioned that TV would be watched on mobile phones, much less that our health-care could be monitored from hundreds of miles away. All of this became reality due to “light touch” policies that allowed technology, business models, private investment and, in the end, consumers to pick winners — and sometimes losers — not the government.
As talk of reclassifying broadband as a Title II service continues to percolate, Verizon is already warning that such a move would force the FCC into “years of court battles.”
Today being April first, the Internet is filled with more pranks and lies than usual. To help you determine fact from fiction, TechCrunch is compiling a handy list of Internet April Fools jokes.
One of the highlights so far: this “confidential video” from online video site Hulu.
Wednesday, March 31
IIA Broadband Ambassador Navarrow Wright of Maximum Leverage Solutions speaks with Michael Cottman on American University Radio. Topics range from the National Broadband Plan and digital literacy to African-American entrepreneurship, technology and education.
Business Week looks into a brewing fight over spectrum between TV broadcasters and wireless carriers:
Ion, Nexstar Broadcasting Group Inc., Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc. and LIN TV Corp. say they’re depending on that spectrum so they can offer live TV via mobile phones. The FCC says carriers such as AT&T Inc. need the airwaves more as smartphones like Apple Inc.’s iPhone cause the amount of data sent through U.S. networks to more than double annually.
“Why is the iPhone entitled to more spectrum than local broadcasters?” said Nexstar Chief Executive Officer Perry Sook, whose Irving, Texas-based company owns or provides services to 62 stations. “When the snowstorm hit Washington, did people rush to an iPhone app to find out what was going on? No, they turned to their local broadcasters.”
With the FCC’s National Broadband Plan calling for the government reclaiming as much as 40% of broadcaster spectrum, this fight could turn into an outright brawl.
The recent launch of Google Buzz — the online giant’s attempt to compete with Twitter — raised a number of privacy concerns. Now, as Ars Technica reports, those concerns have reached Congress:
The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) condemned Google’s mismanagement of the service’s rollout and lack of privacy safeguards. EPIC filed a complaint with the FTC, calling for the organization to review the matter. A bipartisan group of congressmen are the latest to join the chorus. In an open letter addressed to FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz, eleven members of the US House of Representatives called for an investigation of Buzz and closer scrutiny of Google’s pending acquisition of mobile advertising company AdMob.
“We are writing to express our concern over claims that Google’s ‘Google Buzz’ social networking tool breaches online consumer privacy and trust. Due to the high number of individuals whose online privacy is affected by tools like this—either directly or indirectly—we feel that these claims warrant the Commission’s review of Google’s public disclosure of personal information of consumers through Google Buzz,” the letter says.
With the arrival of Apple’s iPad just days away, Seton Hill University in Greensburg, Pennsylvania has announced that starting in the fall every full-time student will receive one of the devices as part of their enrollment.
Tuesday, March 30
Multichannel News sat down with former FCC Chairman Michael Powell to talk about the National Broadband Plan.
On the whole, Powell believes the plan is a great step toward connecting everyone in America to broadband. But when it comes to the idea of reclassifying the Internet as a Title II service, the former Chairman doesn’t mince words:
MultiChannel News: What do you think about the FCC possibly classifying Internet service as a Title II service subject to mandatory access?
Michael Powell: I think that idea is an unadulterated disaster.
MCN: Not a surprise, since yours was the commission that defined it as an information service subject to lighter regulations.
MP: Not entirely. Part of that decision was during my commission, part of that was during Kevin Martin’s tenure [Powell’s successor as chairman]. I see so many misrepresentations of historical fact that it is worth noting here that broadband has never been classified as Title II. You will get people who will say: “We’re going back to something.” No, we never had that something. Cable is the leading broadband provider in the United States and it has never been a Title II and never been a common carrier. … The only thing that was ever Title II was the old dial-up telephone service, more because of historical accident than policy forethought.
So, broadband itself has never been Title II. In fact, all the investment that has been deployed in the United States has been on the assumption that it is a lightly regulated information service. If the commission wants to recklessly change and try to fight the battle to reclassify that, we will be in a period of painful, prolonged uncertainty, confusion and war for probably four to six years with an undoubted trip to the Supreme Court interspersed between.
And for a country that says it wants to dramatically up the amount of private investment going on in broadband, that would seem like a very backward way to do it.
Google and Verizon have not always seen eye-to-eye when it comes to the regulation of the Internet, but they have found some common ground. From a joint editorial by the two companies in the Wall Street Journal:
The Internet has thrived in an environment of minimal regulation. While our two companies don’t agree on every issue, we do agree generally as a matter of policy that the framework of minimal government involvement should continue.
The FCC underscores the importance of creating the right climate for private investment and market-driven innovation to advance broadband. That’s the right approach and why we are encouraged to see the FCC’s plan.